Rating Changes Signal Balanced Credit Trends

Greg Zappin

By Greg Zappin | August 17, 2017

Despite criticism for acting too slow or being backward looking, rating agencies and the credit ratings they assign are still relevant in the corporate bond market today.  Ratings trends can be a useful, albeit imperfect, tool to access over credit quality in the market and sometimes offer a source of alpha if future ratings direction can be correctly anticipated.  Non-financial credit ratings are based on fairly transparent criteria, particularly the leverage and profitability metrics. It’s the qualitative judgments about competitive position, industry dynamics and financial policy that are grey areas.  While new issue ratings have proven to be an accurate gauge of default risk over time, the timing of subsequent ratings actions is a big market gripe.  Ratings are meant to look through cycles, which can create big gaps between an issuer’s ratings and bond pricing and current fundamentals.

Trading aside, I think looking at the ratio of upgrades to downgrades does provide a decent high level view on the general state of credit quality. The chart above shows the ratio of upgrades to downgrades for all investment grade corporate bonds.  While the ratio has declined over the past few years, it tells a story consistent with current moderate default rates and an overall benign credit environment.  It also has remained above 1 since 2012, which is particularly impressive in light of the wave of energy and metals downgrades in 2015 and 2016.  Many of the energy downgrades over the past few years have been due to merger and acquisition and other shareholder friendly activity, which reinforces the idea that event risk, as opposed to default risk, is the larger risk in the investment grade arena.

Key Takeaway

Ratings trajectory is one metric used to gauge credit quality in the marketplace.  Given underlying business fundamentals and the potential for a number of commodity credits to be upgraded, the prospective upgrade/downgrade ratio appears like it will be trending up over the next year.



Disclosure Statement

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

Read More...

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Copyright © 2014 Penn Mutual. All Rights Reserved. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Read Less...

Leave a Reply