A Quick Guide to the Fed Chair Nominees

John Swarr

By John Swarr | October 26, 2017

This week’s Monday Morning O’Malley highlighted the upcoming selection of the next Federal Reserve (Fed) chair. The top candidates for the nomination include Jerome Powell, John Taylor, Janet Yellen, Kevin Warsh, and Gary Cohn.  The Chart of the Week shows recent betting odds on who will receive the nomination. While the odds are fun to talk about, this week’s write-up covers the candidates’ viewpoints and policy stances so the risks behind the candidates can be anticipated. Investors should be prepared for any outcome by understanding how each candidate would lead the Fed on key issues including monetary policy, the balance sheet, transparency, and regulation.

Jerome Powell is currently the frontrunner for the Fed chair nomination and has been a Fed governor since 2012.  Based on his centrist view to Fed actions over the recent years, the consensus is that Powell would maintain the status quo.  Rate hikes and balance sheet reduction would likely continue to progress according to the guidance provided by the current Fed leadership under Janet Yellen. Powell is also a proponent of the Fed’s approach since the Bernanke-era to maintain transparency in its communications to guide markets on policy actions. Powell is expected to maintain the Fed’s discretion-based (as opposed to rules-based) approach to raising or lowering the policy rate. With regulation, Powell has shown support for most post-crisis reforms but would look to simplify and recalibrate certain areas to promote efficiency and reduce ambiguity.

John Taylor – a Stanford economics professor and creator of the famous Taylor Rule – has emerged as the second most-likely candidate to be nominated. Owing to his eponymous rule, Taylor would likely take a more rules-based approach to monetary policy. Based on current levels of employment and inflation, he is expected to be the most hawkish (supportive of higher rates) candidate. If Taylor is selected it would signal a regime change at the Fed, which would increase market volatility due uncertainty around how the “new” Fed would operate.

Current Chairwoman Janet Yellen is a similar candidate to Powell with regard to her views and policy stances; however Powell is expected to be favored to Yellen due to political reasons. Like Powell, she would maintain status quo at the Fed.

Kevin Warsh is a former Fed governor who worked closely with Bernanke during the financial crisis. He is another candidate whose selection would signal a regime change and would likely increase market volatility. Since Warsh left the Fed, he has been critical of the Fed’s transparency and focus on short-term risks. He has also questioned the efficacy of the Fed’s quantitative easing (QE) programs and would look to reduce the Fed’s balance sheet to its pre-crisis size. Warsh is a proponent of tax-reform and deregulation and would seek to use both to achieve higher growth.

Gary Cohn is the current Director of the National Economic Council and chief economic advisor to the President.  Like Warsh, Cohn believes higher growth is attainable through tax-reform and deregulation. In his current role, Cohn has expressed desire to keep the U.S. dollar competitive in the global economy, suggesting he would be dovish (supportive of lower rates) as Fed chair.

Key Takeaway

Understanding the candidates’ viewpoints and policy stances is the first step for investors to prepare for the upcoming Fed chair nomination. Investors should also be thinking about what outcomes markets are currently discounting, and how that discounting would change based on each outcome. For example, the Fed’s dot plot is projecting three rate hikes for next year while futures markets are pricing in two. Would a Yellen nomination result in an increase in short-term interest rates as markets price in a higher likelihood of a third hike? Or would short-term interest rates fall due to the removal of discounting for the more hawkish candidates? It’s also important to note that a vice chair needs to be appointed, and any appointment needs confirmation from the Senate.



Disclosure Statement

The material provided here is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.

Read More...

This material is for informational use only. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Penn Mutual Asset Management.  This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy.

Opinions and statements of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute judgment of the author and are subject to change without notice.  The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from sources deemed to be reliable but should not be assumed to be accurate or complete.  Statements that reflect projections or expectations of future financial or economic performance of the markets may be considered forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly.  Any forecasts contained in this material are based on various estimates and assumptions, and there can be no assurance that such estimates or assumptions will prove accurate.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  All information referenced in preparation of this material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and Penn Mutual Asset Management shall have no liability for decisions based upon such information.

High-Yield bonds are subject to greater fluctuations in value and risk of loss of income and principal. Investing in higher yielding, lower rated corporate bonds have a greater risk of price fluctuations and loss of principal and income than U.S. Treasury bonds and bills. Government securities offer a higher degree of safety and are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest if held to maturity.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This material may not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.

Copyright © 2014 Penn Mutual. All Rights Reserved. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Read Less...

Leave a Reply